This page/course is presently under development. Please revisit on 1 June 2025 for the updated version.
Academic integrity—upholding honesty, trust, and fairness—is vital for credible TVET education and professional workplaces, where trust ensures safe, reliable trade practices. Digital environments offer benefits but introduce risks, tempting students to misuse resources or misunderstand acceptable practices due to low digital literacy or unclear expectations. Identifying these challenges helps educators foster a culture of integrity, ensuring students demonstrate authentic competence in technical assessments, which is critical for their future careers.
Common Challenges and Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity in TVET
The table below outlines common academic integrity challenges faced in TVET learning environments, along with practical strategies to address them. Each challenge is accompanied by a real-world example relevant to trade education and a suggested approach to help you foster ethical learning practices.
This is not an exhaustive list, but it highlights some of the most frequently encountered issues in Pacific TVET classrooms. You are encouraged to adapt the strategies to suit your own teaching context, institutional policies, and available resources.
| Challenge
|
What It Looks Like in TVET
|
Strategy to Address It
|
Plagiarism
Using someone else’s words, ideas, or work without proper citation.
|
A hospitality student copies hygiene procedures from a website into their assignment without citation.
|
Teach what plagiarism means and show how to give credit properly using a reference list. Where available, use plagiarism checkers (e.g., Turnitin) with care, noting that they only detect text-based similarity. Combine these tools with oral follow-ups to confirm understanding.
|
Contract Cheating
Submitting work done by someone else, such as a peer or paid service.
|
A carpentry student submits a report written by someone else and cannot explain key concepts during a follow-up
|
Conduct brief oral follow-ups to confirm student understanding and ensure the work is their own.Example: After submission, ask students to explain one step from their report in their own words.
|
Unauthorised Collaboration
Working with others on an individual task without permission.
|
Automotive students complete an individual quiz by sharing answers in a WhatsApp group, assuming it’s allowed.
|
Clearly state collaboration rules for each task. At the top of worksheets or instructions, include a statement such as “This is an individual task.” Add questions that require personal experiences or context-based responses to reduce the likelihood of answer sharing.
|
AI Misuse
Submitting AI-generated content as original work, without disclosure.
|
A plumbing student uses ChatGPT to write a full assignment and submits it without editing or disclosure.
|
Clarify your institution’s policy on AI use and communicate it clearly to students. If AI tools are not permitted for assessments, state this explicitly (e.g., “AI-generated content is not allowed and must not be submitted as original work”). If limited use is permitted (e.g., for idea generation), ensure students declare how and where AI was used. Where available, use plagiarism checkers as an initial screening tool, but follow up with oral questions or reflections to confirm originality—especially since AI-generated text may not always trigger plagiarism alerts.
|
Unclear Expectations
Misunderstanding what constitutes academic misconduct due to lack of guidance.
|
A construction student copies diagrams from OERs without attribution, thinking it’s okay because they’re “free.”
|
Review citation basics and include an activity where students practise attributing open content using tools like Attribution Builder. Display “How to Cite” posters in the classroom.
|
Ease of Access
Using readily available online content without adapting or referencing it.
|
A hospitality student finds a sample cleaning checklist online and submits it without adapting it to their local workplace or giving credit.
|
Create personalised or localised tasks. Example: Ask students to write a cleaning checklist based on the specific tools and procedures used in their own training kitchen or hospitality venue. Use reflection questions to encourage original thinking.
|
These challenges may not always stem from intentional dishonesty. Often, they arise from confusion, pressure to pass, or limited awareness of digital ethics. Your role in clarifying expectations, modelling integrity, and designing relevant, low-cheating-risk assessments is key to promoting authentic learning and preparing learners for responsible trade practice.
This page/course is presently under development. Please revisit on 1 June 2025 for the updated version.
Academic integrity—upholding honesty, trust, and fairness—is vital for credible TVET education and professional workplaces, where trust ensures safe, reliable trade practices. Digital environments offer benefits but introduce risks, tempting students to misuse resources or misunderstand acceptable practices due to low digital literacy or unclear expectations. Identifying these challenges helps educators foster a culture of integrity, ensuring students demonstrate authentic competence in technical assessments, which is critical for their future careers.
Common Challenges and Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity in TVET
The table below outlines common academic integrity challenges faced in TVET learning environments, along with practical strategies to address them. Each challenge is accompanied by a real-world example relevant to trade education and a suggested approach to help you foster ethical learning practices.
This is not an exhaustive list, but it highlights some of the most frequently encountered issues in Pacific TVET classrooms. You are encouraged to adapt the strategies to suit your own teaching context, institutional policies, and available resources.
Using someone else’s words, ideas, or work without proper citation.
Submitting work done by someone else, such as a peer or paid service.
Working with others on an individual task without permission.
Submitting AI-generated content as original work, without disclosure.
Clarify your institution’s policy on AI use and communicate it clearly to students. If AI tools are not permitted for assessments, state this explicitly (e.g., “AI-generated content is not allowed and must not be submitted as original work”). If limited use is permitted (e.g., for idea generation), ensure students declare how and where AI was used. Where available, use plagiarism checkers as an initial screening tool, but follow up with oral questions or reflections to confirm originality—especially since AI-generated text may not always trigger plagiarism alerts.
Misunderstanding what constitutes academic misconduct due to lack of guidance.
Using readily available online content without adapting or referencing it.
Create personalised or localised tasks. Example: Ask students to write a cleaning checklist based on the specific tools and procedures used in their own training kitchen or hospitality venue. Use reflection questions to encourage original thinking.
These challenges may not always stem from intentional dishonesty. Often, they arise from confusion, pressure to pass, or limited awareness of digital ethics. Your role in clarifying expectations, modelling integrity, and designing relevant, low-cheating-risk assessments is key to promoting authentic learning and preparing learners for responsible trade practice.
Project lead
Supported by
Development Partner